This rig also works well for trout. Increase leader length to ~24" for trout.
_________________ -housed white guy
Chip McShoulder
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2014 11:58 am
dog licking ice cream coneJoined: 11 Aug 2008Posts: 3022Location: Rainbow Road
Awesome, I will try both of those in short order. I had been tying Texas rigs (for both the catfish (powerbait) and the bass (plastic worms/tubes)). Do you recommend Carolina/12" leaders for bass too?
GO SEAHAWKS!! 12 for LYFEJoined: 20 Jul 2011Posts: 3092Location: King County
Bass don't generally bite on bait, unless you have live minnows or shad.
You tie directly to the top of jigs with your main line, if the weight is not enough to cast with the jig alone, crimp as many split shots needed 18" above jig. The goal here is to get your knot cinched so it's at the very top of the eyelet so you get good up and down action.
For bass and catfish I would feel safe using 6-8# test p-line monofilament. If p-line is too pricy I like izorline.
The Palomar knot is the knot of choice, unless you know how to snell your hooks.
_________________ -housed white guy
caustic meatloaf
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2014 2:29 pm
Joined: 06 Dec 2010Posts: 1235537Location: a hammy melange...
That looks like english, but no hablo your fishtalk.
_________________ HIS NAME IS EDMUND
Chip McShoulder
Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2014 2:19 pm
dog licking ice cream coneJoined: 11 Aug 2008Posts: 3022Location: Rainbow Road
GO SEAHAWKS!! 12 for LYFEJoined: 20 Jul 2011Posts: 3092Location: King County
Chip McShoulder wrote:
Nice job t Fitz. Looks like that thing gobbled a worm... or you snagged him, either way success!
_________________ -housed white guy
Chip McShoulder
Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2014 3:17 pm
dog licking ice cream coneJoined: 11 Aug 2008Posts: 3022Location: Rainbow Road
thanks!
the hook was set all the way through his lip and into the roof of the mouth (and no sign of the rubber worm), was kinda hard to get it out (but he ultimately survived and swims another day). I'm switching to some smaller hooks for next time.
So Joe,
Long time reader, first time caller, here. I have a Qwest-branded Actiontec M1000 DSL modem/wireless router combo. It's a solid piece of equipment that rarely gives me any trouble in my pretty average Wi-Fi endeavors. Until now. It's incompatible with ma Chromecast since it don't support no multi-castin. I'm back to the annoyance and clutter of having a separate wireless router. I'm having a hell of a time finding a DSL modem/wireless router combo that is compatible with Chromecast. Wth? Is this really such an impossible request? Am I dumb for wanting the simplicity of a single unit? Looking for guidance. I live in a single-level 2BR apt.
Also, side question, how come I haven't needed multicasting before now? Aside from being able to stream the facetoobs to my tee-vay, what other kinds of applications utilize multicasting?
Yours truly,
Drowning-in-devices
caustic meatloaf
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2014 8:11 am
Joined: 06 Dec 2010Posts: 1235537Location: a hammy melange...
It's true, chromecast only supports 2.4Ghz 802.11n, it does not support 5Ghz wireless.
Unfortunately, your kinda SOL regarding trying to find a bundled DSL/Wireless router that will work with it. To begin with, they're not very common, and secondly, they are not really made to be highly modifiable and configurable - after all, they're combo units to ensure that whomever uses them has the least amount of configuration and setup necessary to get on the intertubes. As such, a lot of additional nice features are often excluded for simplicity.
Multicasting allows for greater wireless coverage at a consistently higher speed. The 2.4Ghz spectrum is actually rather busy, what with other wireless standards operating in that same space - ZigBee, RF interference from microwaves, cordless phones, ANT+, etc. So, the 5Ghz spectrum was opened up for wireless networking use to help future proof 802.11n and allow for newer, faster data standards.
With that said, there are a very few combos that say they support multicast. Since I am not familiar with a lot of the off-brand ones, which are less expensive (but caveat emptor), the one I'd recommend for you would be the Netgear DGND3700-100NAS. it's a bit more expensive at $119, and offers a lot of features you may not care about (multiple SSIDs, parental controls, etc.), but it very specifically states that it can operate 802.11N on both 2.4 and 5Ghz bands separately, so it should be able to work with *both* your chromecast *and* any other 802.11n devices that happen to be multiband.
_________________ HIS NAME IS EDMUND
archie
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2014 9:00 am
Joined: 21 Jul 2011Posts: 149Location: cloud nine
OhhhK. that helps much. Although one thing is confusing me...
Quote:
Multicasting allows for greater wireless coverage at a consistently higher speed. The 2.4Ghz spectrum is actually rather busy, what with other wireless standards operating in that same space - ZigBee, RF interference from microwaves, cordless phones, ANT+, etc. So, the 5Ghz spectrum was opened up for wireless networking use to help future proof 802.11n and allow for newer, faster data standards.
Are you conflating multicast and multiband? I'm using an 802.11g wireless router no prob with Chromecast at the moment, so that tells me multicast isn't specific to multiband 802.11n. Regardless, you got me thinking I should make the jump to 802.11n no matter what I end up doing. Is multicasting standard fare for 802.11n? Or more importantly, is it for sure that that Netgear router supports it?
caustic meatloaf
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2014 10:08 am
Joined: 06 Dec 2010Posts: 1235537Location: a hammy melange...
Multicast, specifically for 802.11n, is referring to being able to broadcast and host clients simultaneously on both the 2.4Ghz and 5Ghz frequency bands, since 802.11n, of all the common wireless standards for PCs, can be done on both. However, it's not a standard feature. Often routers will default to only 2.4Ghz in the case of either legacy devices using 802.11A/B/G, or with devices that do not recognized the 5Ghz band for 802.11n, of which the chromecast is a known device that doesn't operate at that frequency.
So, multiband routers can offer 802.11N on *either* 2.4Ghz, *or* 5Ghz, but unless they also support multicast, they cannot do both simultaneously.
Multicast is an approved feature for 802.11n, but wasn't really implemented by a lot of router manufacturers as it's a rather boutique requirement. However, newer 802.11n NICs like to default to 5GHz if they support it because it allows for greater penetration through stuff like walls and such, and is also removed from a lot of casual home RF sources.
_________________ HIS NAME IS EDMUND
limpyweta
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2014 7:48 pm
Joined: 23 Sep 2008Posts: 740Location: North Beach
Dear Joe,
What's up with the PFD PSA fastened to the top of the gates at the Ballard Locks, facing sailors entering the canal? It's a picture of a black outline of a variety of people, with bright colored outlines of a variety of PFD's on almost every person, with the words, "WEAR IT!", or something [points to nose]. But there's one mannish person with no apparent PFD, and a bright outline of only a fanny pack instead of a PFD on them. It doesn't even look from the black outline that guything has a PFD of any kind on them.
Is that where seapeople put CO2 cartridges these days? If they're suggesting fanny pack is an acceptable substitute for PFD, what the shit would they inflate on them? What's in their fanny pack that could save their life when they're knocked into the winter waters of the shipping canal/the lakes?
Cheers
_________________ Alec
archie
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2014 8:00 pm
Joined: 21 Jul 2011Posts: 149Location: cloud nine
caustic meatloaf wrote:
Multicast, specifically for 802.11n, is referring to being able to broadcast and host clients simultaneously on both the 2.4Ghz and 5Ghz frequency bands, since 802.11n, of all the common wireless standards for PCs, can be done on both. However, it's not a standard feature. Often routers will default to only 2.4Ghz in the case of either legacy devices using 802.11A/B/G, or with devices that do not recognized the 5Ghz band for 802.11n, of which the chromecast is a known device that doesn't operate at that frequency.
So, multiband routers can offer 802.11N on *either* 2.4Ghz, *or* 5Ghz, but unless they also support multicast, they cannot do both simultaneously.
Multicast is an approved feature for 802.11n, but wasn't really implemented by a lot of router manufacturers as it's a rather boutique requirement. However, newer 802.11n NICs like to default to 5GHz if they support it because it allows for greater penetration through stuff like walls and such, and is also removed from a lot of casual home RF sources.
Ahh. Ok, thanks Joe! Great stuff, much appreciated
henry
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2014 10:53 am
somewhat piggishJoined: 05 Aug 2005Posts: 5415Location: on porch with shotgun
Joined: 06 Dec 2010Posts: 1235537Location: a hammy melange...
limpyweta wrote:
Dear Joe,
What's up with the PFD PSA fastened to the top of the gates at the Ballard Locks, facing sailors entering the canal? It's a picture of a black outline of a variety of people, with bright colored outlines of a variety of PFD's on almost every person, with the words, "WEAR IT!", or something [points to nose]. But there's one mannish person with no apparent PFD, and a bright outline of only a fanny pack instead of a PFD on them. It doesn't even look from the black outline that guything has a PFD of any kind on them.
Is that where seapeople put CO2 cartridges these days? If they're suggesting fanny pack is an acceptable substitute for PFD, what the shit would they inflate on them? What's in their fanny pack that could save their life when they're knocked into the winter waters of the shipping canal/the lakes?
Cheers
I believe Henry has provided an excellent example of a USCG approved belt PFD. Including amazing camo pattern, which is really critical when people are duck or goose hunting along the ship canal.
Personally, for me, I prefer to be naked with a Ka-Bar clenched between my teeth as I sneak up on slimbering geese as they rest on local docks, coming from the water side. Charlie checks the shores, but he never checks the sea.
_________________ HIS NAME IS EDMUND
Chip McShoulder
Posted: Thu Sep 18, 2014 1:49 pm
dog licking ice cream coneJoined: 11 Aug 2008Posts: 3022Location: Rainbow Road
me wrote:
How to fish?
caustic meatloaf wrote:
3)This time of year is not a great time to fish for Bass. It's post-spawn, so you will likely have a lot of immature bass in the lakes and as such their parents will be busy taking care of them at this early stage, not feeding.
So Joe (and Jake): now that fall approaches, what changes?
Joined: 06 Dec 2010Posts: 1235537Location: a hammy melange...
Well, you have some other runs of fish that are more catchable during the autumn, like river steelhead and lingcod, but obviously for lakes, what you see is what you fish for - often the lakes around here are stocked with various species of trout, with lower/warmer lakes also having bass, and crappie, etc.
I think right now is pinks running predominantly, but they'll slacken off in a few weeks, and after that there's really no big fish runs until next early summer.
_________________ HIS NAME IS EDMUND
Chip McShoulder
Posted: Fri Sep 19, 2014 10:19 am
dog licking ice cream coneJoined: 11 Aug 2008Posts: 3022Location: Rainbow Road
caustic meatloaf wrote:
Well, you have some other runs of fish that are more catchable during the autumn, like river steelhead and lingcod, but obviously for lakes, what you see is what you fish for - often the lakes around here are stocked with various species of trout, with lower/warmer lakes also having bass, and crappie, etc.
I think right now is pinks running predominantly, but they'll slacken off in a few weeks, and after that there's really no big fish runs until next early summer.
well, there are some rivers nearby, so it is in theory an option. keeping in mind that I'm still pretty bad at fishing, and not able to spend the time/money on learning to use/buying something like a fly rod, is this a realistic option, or am I best sticking to the lakes for now?
Joined: 06 Dec 2010Posts: 1235537Location: a hammy melange...
You can still do a lot of fishing without a fly rod - A standard rod & Reel is all I got, really. For river fishing, if you have a fast current, you're kinda SOL for casting from the shore. If you got access to a boat and a buddy, trawling is the way to go. If the river's calm and deep, you can definitely cast from shore and fish that way too; look for eddies and calm places with wide, flat gravel beds to eyeball for salmon, trout like to hand out in deeper pools with rocks, and river bass (which are admittedly rare) like to hand out in the reeds and rushes.
_________________ HIS NAME IS EDMUND
Chip McShoulder
Posted: Fri Sep 19, 2014 10:46 am
dog licking ice cream coneJoined: 11 Aug 2008Posts: 3022Location: Rainbow Road
GO SEAHAWKS!! 12 for LYFEJoined: 20 Jul 2011Posts: 3092Location: King County
Go ahead and disregard most of what Joe said.
As we head into Autumn/fall the freshwater bite tends to be hit and miss. Aggressive eaters like walleye, bass and pike may eat more in prep for winterizing themselves when the bite really shuts down. Most fish will really scale down feeding activity as to hold on to their energy stores when feed is much more scarce during winter months. While they will still feed you will find for now they will push a little deeper.
If ice fishing isn't your thing yet, it should be that shit looks fun.
now if you were back in the PNW I would say that squid and razor clam season is right around the corner.
good luck
follow my fishing blog insta: @bro_ttorff
_________________ -housed white guy
Chip McShoulder
Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2014 6:08 am
dog licking ice cream coneJoined: 11 Aug 2008Posts: 3022Location: Rainbow Road
ice fishing sounds like fun, if there's not too much additional equipment or shacks needed, I'll give it a try
Joined: 06 Dec 2010Posts: 1235537Location: a hammy melange...
Bo Ttorff wrote:
Go ahead and disregard most of what Joe said.
As the old saying goes, sometimes the best way to learn something new on the internet is to post something obviously wrong.
And a buddy of mine has ice fished in Minnesota, and it is fucking fun as hell, especially if you have a fishing shack you can stay in. I'll be trying it out this year most likely, and will report back with results.
_________________ HIS NAME IS EDMUND
Bo Ttorff
Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2014 9:17 am
GO SEAHAWKS!! 12 for LYFEJoined: 20 Jul 2011Posts: 3092Location: King County
Ideally you'd find a friend who has a gas powered auger aka post hole digger.
Joe when you started posting about pinks and lingcod I knew the whole paragraph was coming out the ass.
_________________ -housed white guy
jeff
Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2014 5:35 pm
SOC pussyJoined: 05 May 2006Posts: 4501
Dear Joe (or possibly Andre),
Can I wash my REI tent's rainfly on delicate in a front-load washing machine to remove the mold spots that appeared when the person who borrowed it put it away wet and left it that way?
Your pal, Jeff
tehschkott
Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2014 5:39 pm
daywalkerJoined: 09 Nov 2007Posts: 6108Location: Hatertown
I think you'll need an antifungal for that. Its been awhile but I think they make spray for that sort of thing.
_________________ GREAT UNITER / ORACLE / ELDER
MOOAAR DONGS
caustic meatloaf
Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2014 6:24 am
Joined: 06 Dec 2010Posts: 1235537Location: a hammy melange...
Scott's right - you need an antifungal treatment to get rid of the actual fungus. The stains *might* come out through a wash, but honestly, from what I've seen, you're gonna have mildew stans forever on that fly.
BUT, to remove the actual fungus, I found a handy guide online that tells you how to do it:
I feel like an ass sometimes, but this is really why I do not like to loan out gear.
jeff
Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2014 8:51 am
SOC pussyJoined: 05 May 2006Posts: 4501
joeball wrote:
I feel like an ass sometimes, but this is really why I do not like to loan out gear.
Sometimes you learn that gear has been loaned out AFTER the fact.
#MarriedLife
Dravis Bixel
Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2014 11:34 am
Joined: 14 Mar 2011Posts: 982Location: Wherever you go, there you are
jeff wrote:
joeball wrote:
I feel like an ass sometimes, but this is really why I do not like to loan out gear.
Sometimes you learn that gear has been loaned out AFTER the fact.
#MarriedLife
Were the spots tent chiggers?
_________________ I lie frequently, and often.
tehschkott
Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2014 1:03 pm
daywalkerJoined: 09 Nov 2007Posts: 6108Location: Hatertown
Dear Joe
What reasons would a company like Lockheed Martin - a company with effectively infinite resources - have for publicizing their work on a truck-sized nuclear reactor 5 to 10 years before it's finished, ostensibly to look for partners?
After our conversation coming back from Portland a couple weekends ago, I have a few ideas. But I wanted to ask.
hint: I suspect it has something to do with the R word.
_________________ GREAT UNITER / ORACLE / ELDER
MOOAAR DONGS
caustic meatloaf
Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2014 2:29 pm
Joined: 06 Dec 2010Posts: 1235537Location: a hammy melange...
Ultimately, Everything I have to say on the matter is pure conjecture. But, I think there are a few reasons which might be logical.
Fortuantely, unlike the LENR bullshit out there on the 'net, Lockheed is a pretty well established name and is not going to be sinking in any of its own money into an obvious money losing prospect with the hope of dupeing investors. So, we can effectively rule that out.
However, I think the primary reason is because Lockheed has a few very good technological foundations, and through combining them have been able to do significant amount of research into a new potential industry. In short, aerospace engineering and weapons manufacturing.
It's sorta like civilization, where specific areas of research cannot be done until previous ones have been completed. In this case, the simulation and supercomputing development for effective nuclear weapons simulation is also highly useful for high-energy physics modelling, including plasma fields. The high quality machinery and research into alloys and composites also is required for the fine tooling needed for precise components and mounting surfaces in any device that requires nanometer scale precision.
Lockheed has *both* in spades. The reason they're looking for investors is because while they have done some research, bringing something like this to market is completely out of their sphere. If they could partner up with an existing power generating company to create a marketable fusion reactor, that would be the most preferred outcome.
My hunch is that Lockheed's expertise in high energy flux modelling for nuclear detonations has been applied to the scenario of creating a sustainable neutron flux from a fusion nuclear reaction, and also the associated magnetic fields generated via plasmas or superconducting magnets to counter that flux. Further, all of this requires composite materials that can withstand HIGH temperatures for extended periods of time without ablating and reducing the integrity of the reaction chamber.
Lockheed's experience with re-entry research has created a solid foundation for research and development of high temperature composites, and their government contracts for nuclear weapons testing without detonation has ensured that their computing chops are also top notch.
Why did Lockheed do this? Well, I bet back when they really started into this, apparently according to the article 5 years ago, they already saw the writing on the wall. A war-weary populace, high debt-to-GDP for the US govt, and spiraling costs on their F-35 program really meant that military spending budgets were going to be cut. Better to have a hedge in the back than get hit by a boulder you didn't bother to step out of the way of.
How come they leapfrogged ahead of other research institutions? Because of two reasons. 1)Necessity creates purpose, and that means there is a high incentive to perform research as fast as possible, and 2)Lockheed has likely developed or had access to technologies that the resarch institutions do not. The ITER, being international, sure as hell isn't going to be given access to supercomputing algorithms modelling US nuclear stockpile designs, for example.
_________________ HIS NAME IS EDMUND
tehschkott
Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2014 3:51 pm
daywalkerJoined: 09 Nov 2007Posts: 6108Location: Hatertown
thats pretty much what I thought.
_________________ GREAT UNITER / ORACLE / ELDER
MOOAAR DONGS
Chip McShoulder
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2014 11:30 am
dog licking ice cream coneJoined: 11 Aug 2008Posts: 3022Location: Rainbow Road
Was there a thread once upon a time about waxing/waterproofing a cotton/canvas jacket?
If not, what's the s.o.p. for this?
All times are GMT - 8 Hours
The time now is Fri Aug 11, 2023 6:22 pm
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum