Point83.com Forum Index  »  Westlake Center  »  I won the door prize! or ..
 Post new topic   Reply to topic
Page 1 of 1    
 
MyLilPonyOfDeath
Posted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 11:53 pm Reply with quote
Joined: 21 May 2006 Posts: 35 Location: Capitol Hill

How skateboarding saved my life.

It finally happened tonight. On my way home from work, rush hour, hammering up Pike right in front of Vita. Just pushin' & enjoyin' .. BLAMMO! door swings open, no time to react, bullhorn hooks, i let out a grunt or caterwaul, then the trip to the pavement was actually suspended in relatively slow motion. I was in the Matrix for a longass split second, tucked the left shoulder & buried chin to right shoulder just like i've done too many times when blowing it on my skate or snowboard, rolled & landed sprawled-out on my back in the middle of the street. I fretted for a sec about a car running me over & then scooted on my ass outta the way. Within seconds people were all around & I felt like a stunned idiot. Wiggled toes & fingers, bent my joints, patted myself down for a minute, straightened out my bars & rode away quite shaken AND stirred.

The lady with the frosty blonde hair getting out of the minvan was shook too, and very apologetic -- she didn't know what to do next. I just asked her to please remember to use her sideview mirror & to always just assume that in Seattle there's always a cyclist in the share lane. She tried to get me to share the blame of course, & i'll take some of it because maybe i wasn't as alert as I usually am .. but my flashy light was flashin'. No matter how much you've honed your Shaolin to avoid those situations, sometimes when it happens for serious, there's nothing to do but accept the fate of impact. I dunno. Either way, sudden edge of door is hells of sharp & skary.

Be careful out there y'all.

_________________
"I enjoyed myself from within myself on behalf of myself." --Jesco White The Dancing Outlaw
-------
http://TheRangeLife.com
View user's profile Send private message
 
Finn
Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 12:27 am Reply with quote
Alabama Joined: 15 Sep 2006 Posts: 303 Location: Central District

Jeeze! Hope you're still okay tomorrow.

'Til we outnumber them...
View user's profile Send private message
 
gsbarnes
Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 10:45 am Reply with quote
Joined: 15 Aug 2006 Posts: 2666 Location: No Fun Town, USA

Seattle Municipal Code wrote:
Section 11.58.050 OPENING AND CLOSING VEHICLE DOORS. No person shall enter, leave, or open the door of a motor vehicle on the side adjacent to moving traffic unless and until it is reasonably safe to do so, and can be done without interfering with the movement of other traffic, nor shall any person leave a door open on the side of a vehicle adjacent to moving traffic for a period of time longer than necessary to load or unload passengers.

_________________
I have always thought in the back of my mind: Cheese and Onions
View user's profile Send private message
 
TrikerTrev
Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 7:09 pm Reply with quote
Joined: 23 Oct 2006 Posts: 2303 Location: FOCO, MOFO!!!

nice Jedi moves there brah!

way to use the matrix to your advantage. Glad you didn't join the church of the walking wounded.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
 
Vann
Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 8:12 pm Reply with quote
Joined: 03 Mar 2006 Posts: 311

MyLilPonyOfDeath wrote:
.. but my flashy light was flashin'.


maybe if you were more like this....
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/6357005.stm
...you'd have been safe.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
 
Aaron
Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 11:08 pm Reply with quote
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 4645

This may cause some controversy, but any cyclist that gets "doored" it is their own damn fault! I see so many of you just riding along in the door zone. Move 4 feet away! The law says you must ride as far to the right as is safe. Well any closer than 4 feet to a parked car is unsafe. By 4 feet, I mean 4 feet from your shoulder. One should never even come close to getting doored. Seriously, pick up any book about cycling and there is a section about how not to get doored. Looking into each car window for a driver is bullshit. You cannot be that attentive. Make it a habit to just take the lane. Cars can just go around in the "passing/turning" lane on road dieted streets and in the proper passing "suicide" lane on 4 lane arterials. Now, the next time a door swings open, you will be far enough away to just keep riding.

This is the very reason Cascade, David Hiller, the SBAB, and all the rest of TBC sucks [Henry's] ass. They want to put narrow bike lanes right in the door zone. Some bike lanes are only 3 or 4 feet wide -- Like the one on 2nd Avenue or on Dexter. Just take the lane folks. And speak up at bike planning meetings. The only way to make a safe bike lane next to cars is for the bike lane to be 6 feet wide. Then you can ride 4 feet away from the car doors and still be in the bike lane. The only way to do this is to REMOVE the parking from one side of the street. An added benefit to this is that there will be no cars along one bike lane. This should be the down hill side if possible.
View user's profile Send private message
 
lantius
Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 11:15 pm Reply with quote
1337 Joined: 22 Jul 2005 Posts: 6705 Location: right over

Aaron wrote:
This may cause some controversy, but any cyclist that gets "doored" it is their own damn fault!


it doesn't really cause any controversy as far as i'm concerned, you're wrong. it is always the door-opener's fault if they door you, since the onus is on them to avoid causing any interference with traffic.

i agree, don't get doored - because someone who is 'in the right' but with the door prize still loses, but if it DOES happen to you, don't let aaron convince you that you are at fault. you are not. if you open your door into traffic and a cyclist hits it because you didn't check, just be glad it wasn't a car, and make sure you look next time.

with all that said, bike lanes are particularly dangerous for this, and wide outside lanes don't do anything to fix it either. the whole concept of subsidized parking on city right-of-ways is retarded anyhow, we should get rid of all street parking and add better sidewalks, bicycle lanes, and greenery.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
 
martin
Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 9:31 am Reply with quote
Joined: 30 Jan 2006 Posts: 712

lantius wrote:
Aaron wrote:
This may cause some controversy, but any cyclist that gets "doored" it is their own damn fault!


it doesn't really cause any controversy as far as i'm concerned, you're wrong. it is always the door-opener's fault if they door you, since the onus is on them to avoid causing any interference with traffic.


Yep - door openers fault 100% of the time. My dad opened his door in Seattle once and bus took it off for him - the cops were on the scene in minutes (thanks Metro) and he was written up. Bikes, buses, cars - all the same as it relates to opening doors.

Right and hurt is still no good. Getting doored SUCKS.
View user's profile Send private message
 
coupdegrace
Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 10:10 am Reply with quote
Joined: 01 Nov 2006 Posts: 168

lantius wrote:
Aaron wrote:
This may cause some controversy, but any cyclist that gets "doored" it is their own damn fault!


it doesn't really cause any controversy as far as i'm concerned, you're wrong. it is always the door-opener's fault if they door you, since the onus is on them to avoid causing any interference with traffic.

... the whole concept of subsidized parking on city right-of-ways is retarded anyhow, we should get rid of all street parking ...



Yes, legally the door opener is always at fault. However what Aaron is suggesting is that a cyclist can and should take responsiblity for his/her safety by riding vc and that certain facilities discourage and/or inhibit safe vehicular cycling.

I agree that "subsidized parking on city right-of-ways is retarded", but until the cars go away I doubt street parking will go away!
View user's profile Send private message
 
Finn
Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 10:27 am Reply with quote
Alabama Joined: 15 Sep 2006 Posts: 303 Location: Central District

Aaron, that rugged individualist, is in part, correct, though. Follow this one carefully: If you have a collision with a motorist, and you or your bike are not 100% street legal, the cops, courts, or insurance companies can take advantage of you. By not wearing a helmet, say, one could lose all legal recourse in the case of an accident. Same with lights, brakes, blood alcohol level, etc.
But mostly, listen to Lee, kids. And take care of eachother.
View user's profile Send private message
 
coupdegrace
Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 10:34 am Reply with quote
Joined: 01 Nov 2006 Posts: 168

Finn wrote:
.
But mostly, listen to Lee, kid.


Why? What did Lee say that could help a cyclist to avoid being doored?
View user's profile Send private message
 
lantius
Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 10:41 am Reply with quote
1337 Joined: 22 Jul 2005 Posts: 6705 Location: right over

coupdegrace wrote:
Finn wrote:
.
But mostly, listen to Lee, kid.

Why? What did Lee say that could help a cyclist to avoid being doored?

huh? i'm not saying "hey ride in the door lane", i'm saying "if it does happen it's not your fault."

even if you habitually take the lane there's times when you can unintentionally get into the door zone, and that's when it's important to not let the inattentive motorist make you take the blame for their mistake.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
 
martin
Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 11:26 am Reply with quote
Joined: 30 Jan 2006 Posts: 712

lantius wrote:
coupdegrace wrote:
Finn wrote:
.
But mostly, listen to Lee, kid.

Why? What did Lee say that could help a cyclist to avoid being doored?

huh? i'm not saying "hey ride in the door lane", i'm saying "if it does happen it's not your fault."

even if you habitually take the lane there's times when you can unintentionally get into the door zone, and that's when it's important to not let the inattentive motorist make you take the blame for their mistake.


I got doored last year in the right-middle lane on 4th. Jackass opened the passenger door to hop out while waiting to get started for a light. Taking the lane doesnt' guarantee much.
View user's profile Send private message
 
jeff
Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 11:43 am Reply with quote
SOC pussy Joined: 05 May 2006 Posts: 4501

Arguing over inane little details is what makes this club special.
View user's profile Send private message
 
coupdegrace
Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 11:54 am Reply with quote
Joined: 01 Nov 2006 Posts: 168

[quote="lantius"]
coupdegrace wrote:
Finn wrote:
.
But mostly, listen to Lee, kid.

Why? What did Lee say that could help a cyclist to avoid being doored?

huh? i'm not saying "hey ride in the door lane", i'm saying "if it does happen it's not your fault."quote]

And I'm not saying that you are saying "hey ride in the door lane", and "if it does happen it's not your fault."

This discussion boils down to the Aaron's use of the word 'fault' and his intended meaning of the word 'fault'. I think that Aaron's use of the word 'fault' was intended to mean personal responsiblity not legal responsibility. Aaron supported his meaning or use of the word 'fault' by providing a suggestion on how a cyclist could ride to avoid being doored. I do not think that Aaron is suggesting that the cyclist is legally at fault or responsible.

I would like to see a successful lawsuit against a municipality who requires cyclists to ride in a bike lane when one is present for placing a bike lane in a door zone where a cyclist was critically injured or killed. Bike Lane design and advocacy would certainly change then.

My hope is to bring us together on this issue than to create a division between us, with this post.
View user's profile Send private message
 
lantius
Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 12:24 pm Reply with quote
1337 Joined: 22 Jul 2005 Posts: 6705 Location: right over

i agree with you, but the .83 forums != cascade. the folks here know (some all too well) the dangers of the door lane and don't need to be told by aaron the dangers of riding there, we're lane takers (and splitters, and red light runners) in general. what they might not know is that the motorist is basically always at fault in door-zone conflicts.

aaron's post started off by saying "it is their own damn fault!", which is just not true. yes, trusting car drivers to be careful is like trusting a hyperactive 5 year old on methamphetamines with a firearm, but if you do get doored don't let them convince you that it's your fault. maybe if enough motorists get sued by cyclists they doored we'll get them on our side as well in terms of fixing shitty bike lane design?

ultimately you see, i agree with you that perhaps we could get door-zone bike lanes ended, perhaps as an "attractive nuisance", since bike lanes look like safe places to ride but are actually quite dangerous.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
 
derrickito
Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 2:09 pm Reply with quote
now with 50 percent more EVIL Joined: 22 Jul 2005 Posts: 10566

i, for one, welcome our new hyperactive 5 year old on methamphetamines with a firearm overlords
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
 
gsbarnes
Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 2:44 pm Reply with quote
Joined: 15 Aug 2006 Posts: 2666 Location: No Fun Town, USA

derrickito wrote:
i, for one, welcome our new hyperactive 5 year old on methamphetamines with a firearm overlords


I don't. Clearly, you've never pulled duty watching kindergarteners.

_________________
I have always thought in the back of my mind: Cheese and Onions
View user's profile Send private message
 
TrikerTrev
Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 4:29 pm Reply with quote
Joined: 23 Oct 2006 Posts: 2303 Location: FOCO, MOFO!!!

lantius wrote:
a hyperactive 5 year old on methamphetamines with a firearm


Just what the fuck does my child have to do with this???
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
 
TrikerTrev
Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 4:51 pm Reply with quote
Joined: 23 Oct 2006 Posts: 2303 Location: FOCO, MOFO!!!

Aaron wrote:
This may cause some controversy, but any cyclist that gets "doored" it is their own damn fault! I see so many of you just riding along in the door zone. Move 4 feet away! The law says you must ride as far to the right as is safe. Well any closer than 4 feet to a parked car is unsafe. By 4 feet, I mean 4 feet from your shoulder. One should never even come close to getting doored. Seriously, pick up any book about cycling and there is a section about how not to get doored. Looking into each car window for a driver is bullshit. You cannot be that attentive. Make it a habit to just take the lane. Cars can just go around in the "passing/turning" lane on road dieted streets and in the proper passing "suicide" lane on 4 lane arterials. Now, the next time a door swings open, you will be far enough away to just keep riding.

This is the very reason Cascade, David Hiller, the SBAB, and all the rest of TBC sucks [Henry's] ass. They want to put narrow bike lanes right in the door zone. Some bike lanes are only 3 or 4 feet wide -- Like the one on 2nd Avenue or on Dexter. Just take the lane folks. And speak up at bike planning meetings. The only way to make a safe bike lane next to cars is for the bike lane to be 6 feet wide. Then you can ride 4 feet away from the car doors and still be in the bike lane. The only way to do this is to REMOVE the parking from one side of the street. An added benefit to this is that there will be no cars along one bike lane. This should be the down hill side if possible.


I was ALMOST ready to agree with you EXCEPT, I for one have been doored by an asshat exiting the PASSENGER SIDE door in the traffic lane!

Just how the fuck was that MY fualt?

When I say ALMOST...your argument isn't unsound. Unlikely, but not unsound. A 6 foot bike lane would be ideal, removing parked cars from the side of the street would allow for that lane in most circumstances. Taking the road when appropriate is also ideal. But to blame the biker for the actions of the inattentive driver (or passenger) is fucking ridiculous.

Thats almost like saying it was Gypsy's or 'Bamas fualt for getting hit. Whether it was or not is neither here-nor-there, point is we currently do not have all the ideal conditions in our favor when we ride (duh) and it is the responsibility of the CAR river to watch the fuck out...hence the RCW.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
 
Aaron
Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 9:45 pm Reply with quote
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 4645

Trevor, you just ride UNDER the door, right?!

Yes, Gypsie could have avoided the accident. Now she knows. Don't ever assume cars will give the right of way. She had it.

Ride in the middle of the lane and cannot ever get doored. It is pretty simple, folks.

Isn't it odd that we hear of all these cyclists getting doored, but you almost never hear of car doors getting ripped off by other cars?

Ride your bike where the right wheels of the car drive and you cannot get doored. In that position, your handlebars are about 5 feet from the parked cars. Reverse this for one-way streets. If you are doing the speed limit, then ride in the middle of the lane.

Yeah, I was not talking about legal fault.
View user's profile Send private message
 
lantius
Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 10:43 pm Reply with quote
1337 Joined: 22 Jul 2005 Posts: 6705 Location: right over

Aaron wrote:
Isn't it odd that we hear of all these cyclists getting doored, but you almost never hear of car doors getting ripped off by other cars?


maybe that's because you run a bike shop and not an auto-body repair shop?

do you think they installed those lights at the end of car doors just to warn oncoming cyclists?
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
 
freemywrld
Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 10:56 pm Reply with quote
Joined: 30 May 2006 Posts: 374 Location: Lost

Ok, I'm going to randomly pipe into this discussion now. While many of us are more than comfortable taking the lane, a lot of cyclists (espcially inexperienced or casual riders) are not comfortable taking the lane, as cars can be very intimidating. These are the folks that tend to make use of these crazy things called "bike lanes". One would imagine that they are there for the use of bikes. Now if a car is parking in the bike lane, and its driver is a dipshit and doesn't look before opening their door and doors this poor soul, you cannot honestly berrate that cyclist for getting hit, not taking the lane, etc. etc. You just can't. Not everyone rides their bike every day. Not everyone is fearless on their bike. In fact, a lot of people feel very vulnerable on their bikes. And getting hit while in a bike line by a doofus in a car is a great way to ensure that fewer people make the switch to bike-powered transportation.

Just my two cents..

*ducks back under rock*

_________________
Beer is both food and water, but neither water nor food is beer.
View user's profile Send private message
 
Aaron
Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 11:24 pm Reply with quote
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 4645

I see what you are saying, Wendy. So if the city installs bike lanes in the door zone, then it is the city's fault. It is like we are living in a crazy world!
I am not really saying it is the cyclist's fault, just that getting doored is easily prevented. Like not getting hit when you cross the street. This stupid city removes cross walks too. I'll probably get doored then hit crossing the street tommorow.

Seems like it all boils down to education. Drivers LOOK for cars because they don't want their door ripped off, but they are not trained to look for cyclists. Ironically, bike lanes in the door zone, will pretty much ensure that car doors don't get ripped off by other cars any longer.
View user's profile Send private message
 
freemywrld
Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 11:31 pm Reply with quote
Joined: 30 May 2006 Posts: 374 Location: Lost

Aaron wrote:
I'll probably get doored then hit crossing the street tommorow.


Ha! I'll be sure to come on the ride tomorrow just to see that!

And for the record, I understand the point you were trying to make, too, and I don't necessarily disagree with you. I was just tossing out another angle to consider. Oh, and its ALWAYS the city's fault.. duh! (its the MAN trying to keep us down)

_________________
Beer is both food and water, but neither water nor food is beer.
View user's profile Send private message
 
jeff
Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 9:40 am Reply with quote
SOC pussy Joined: 05 May 2006 Posts: 4501

[/img]
View user's profile Send private message
 
lantius
Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 10:20 am Reply with quote
1337 Joined: 22 Jul 2005 Posts: 6705 Location: right over

jeff wrote:


man jeff, don't you have some messengers to go talk trash about?
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
 
TrikerTrev
Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 10:23 am Reply with quote
Joined: 23 Oct 2006 Posts: 2303 Location: FOCO, MOFO!!!

Aaron wrote:
Trevor, you just ride UNDER the door, right?!

Yes, Gypsie could have avoided the accident. Now she knows. Don't ever assume cars will give the right of way. She had it.

Ride in the middle of the lane and cannot ever get doored. It is pretty simple, folks.

Isn't it odd that we hear of all these cyclists getting doored, but you almost never hear of car doors getting ripped off by other cars?

Ride your bike where the right wheels of the car drive and you cannot get doored. In that position, your handlebars are about 5 feet from the parked cars. Reverse this for one-way streets. If you are doing the speed limit, then ride in the middle of the lane.

Yeah, I was not talking about legal fault.


Don't I WISH...LOL...any collision I have with a car is gonna be reminiscent of the 50 teaching of how to survive a nuclear holocaust..."duck and cover"!

When i do get doored it's gonna be a mess cause i'll likely stuff that 65 tooth ring into either the door and or their body and do plenty of damage to both the car and myself (and i'll probably be trike-less again)!

Please don't take my comment about gypsy the wrong way...I mean no harm or insult.

Wendy, you make great points. I for one Ride in the road as much as I can, however it is never that simple.

Just one last wack at the pony.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
 
jeff
Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 10:31 am Reply with quote
SOC pussy Joined: 05 May 2006 Posts: 4501

lantius wrote:
jeff wrote:


man jeff, don't you have some messengers to go talk trash about?


Sorry dad.
View user's profile Send private message
 
MyLilPonyOfDeath
Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 11:52 am Reply with quote
Joined: 21 May 2006 Posts: 35 Location: Capitol Hill

the reason i was in the, ahem, "share lane" (denoted by the "sharrows") is because i was riding uphill at rush hour. i usually give a very wide berth to parked cars when i'm haulin' oats downhill .. but when i'm climbing, solo, at night, during rush hour, i generally stick to the inside & just try to be alert. at no point did i ever suggest that it was exclusively the door-opener's fault. while lee is correct in saying the driver bears the legal onus, the laws of tonnage & reality dictate that the onus of self preservation resides in my court.

_________________
"I enjoyed myself from within myself on behalf of myself." --Jesco White The Dancing Outlaw
-------
http://TheRangeLife.com
View user's profile Send private message
 
Aaron
Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 2:56 pm Reply with quote
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 4645

MyLilPonyOfDeath wrote:
the reason i was in the, ahem, "share lane" (denoted by the "sharrows") is because i was riding uphill at rush hour. i usually give a very wide berth to parked cars when i'm haulin' oats downhill .. but when i'm climbing, solo, at night, during rush hour, i generally stick to the inside & just try to be alert. at no point did i ever suggest that it was exclusively the door-opener's fault. while lee is correct in saying the driver bears the legal onus, the laws of tonnage & reality dictate that the onus of self preservation resides in my court.


That is pretty much sums up what I was trying to say. Sorry you got hurt, man. Who are you, anyway? Oh, and you heal, how is your bike?
View user's profile Send private message
 
Jace
Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 9:06 pm Reply with quote
Joined: 11 Oct 2005 Posts: 601 Location: Seattle

Quote:
|


Last edited by Jace on Fri Feb 16, 2007 2:13 am; edited 1 time in total
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
 
langston
Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 12:15 am Reply with quote
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 5547 Location: Columbia City

Jace wrote:
Aaron wrote:
This may cause some controversy...

You still actually hang out with this bike thief? Shit...


oh fuck off, poser POS. You ride a bike because you don't know how to drive, not because you give a shit.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
 
Stanglor
Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 8:48 am Reply with quote
Joined: 28 Jan 2006 Posts: 555 Location: Wallingford

langston wrote:
Jace wrote:
Aaron wrote:
This may cause some controversy...

You still actually hang out with this bike thief? Shit...


...You ride a bike because you don't know how to drive, not because you give a shit.


I resemble that remark...

Of course unlike the target of your remark, I'm shorter, heavier, and can do simple math.

_________________
Confidential to everybody: "Pearl necklace" is out. "Cheney" is in. Pass it on.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
 
lantius
Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:38 am Reply with quote
1337 Joined: 22 Jul 2005 Posts: 6705 Location: right over

langston wrote:
Jace wrote:
Aaron wrote:
This may cause some controversy...

You still actually hang out with this bike thief? Shit...


oh fuck off, poser POS. You ride a bike because you don't know how to drive, not because you give a shit.


true story. it's a little lesson in basic logic: cool people make fun of aaron, but not all people who make fun of aaron are cool.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
 
mcrawfor
Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 10:05 am Reply with quote
Joined: 09 May 2006 Posts: 1039 Location: Ballard

Jace wrote:
whatever he said before it was edited away


and stop killing dogs while you're at it.

_________________
-miles
View user's profile Send private message
 
Reply to topic
Page 1 of 1    
Point83.com Forum Index  »  Westlake Center  »  I won the door prize! or ..
All times are GMT - 8 Hours
The time now is Sat Aug 12, 2023 8:17 am
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
 


Forums | Calendar | TOS | Tapirs

© 2004-2015 Point83
Point83 is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Joby Lafky Corporation