Point83.com Forum Index  »  Westlake Center  »  OT: a race but not an alleycat
 Post new topic   Reply to topic
Page 1 of 1    
 
lantius
Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 9:14 pm Reply with quote
1337 Joined: 22 Jul 2005 Posts: 6705 Location: right over

Jetski to Bellingham. $100 to the first person to make it.

The plan is to have a line of $100 bills leading to Juneau. I've volunteered the first point and Miles has volunteered the end point. Anybody else want to pitch in or compete against Henry's ridiculous aspirations?
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
 
ksep
Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 9:45 pm Reply with quote
Joined: 27 Jan 2007 Posts: 1879 Location: Westlake

Could you describe the difficulty in jetskiing? It seems easier, and faster, than riding a bicycle. And apparently cycling to bellingham isn't so bad.

Do they get awful gas mileage such that the $100 compensation isn't worth it?

_________________
-Kevin
View user's profile Send private message
 
gsbarnes
Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 10:01 pm Reply with quote
Joined: 15 Aug 2006 Posts: 2666 Location: No Fun Town, USA

Seems easier just to walk to Bellingham. And walking is allowed. So who wants to walk to Bellingham from Magnuson Park and take Lee's money?

_________________
I have always thought in the back of my mind: Cheese and Onions
View user's profile Send private message
 
joby
Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 10:07 pm Reply with quote
goes to eleven Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 3899 Location: The Cloud

Hmm

the web site says that

"Driving a Jetski for 7 hours produces as many hydrocarbons as driving a car for 100,000 miles."

By my calculations, this means a jetski consumes 1000 gallons of gas an hour.

I want to see this!
View user's profile Send private message
 
pyörä
Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 5:41 am Reply with quote
Joined: 09 Jan 2006 Posts: 69 Location: bicycle

joby wrote:
Hmm

the web site says that

"Driving a Jetski for 7 hours produces as many hydrocarbons as driving a car for 100,000 miles."

By my calculations, this means a jetski consumes 1000 gallons of gas an hour.

I want to see this!


'produces', not 'consumes'

the hydrocarbons in question are probably incompletely burned fuel and two-stroke oil
View user's profile Send private message
 
jeff
Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 7:50 am Reply with quote
SOC pussy Joined: 05 May 2006 Posts: 4501

A jet ski would be pretty tough. If you've ever ridden one you'll know it's not as easy as it looks. A waverunner (where you sit) would be a piece of cake, plus their seat opens up to reveal a beer cooler.
View user's profile Send private message
 
Aaron
Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 12:48 pm Reply with quote
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 4645

pyörä wrote:
joby wrote:
Hmm

the web site says that

"Driving a Jetski for 7 hours produces as many hydrocarbons as driving a car for 100,000 miles."

By my calculations, this means a jetski consumes 1000 gallons of gas an hour.

I want to see this!


'produces', not 'consumes'

the hydrocarbons in question are probably incompletely burned fuel and two-stroke oil


Indeed. Most 2-stoke engines..... lawn mowers, leaf blowers, mopeds (sorry Dean), chain saws, etc, are just plain noisier than they need to be.

There are alternatives. Save the gas for driving your kids to school!







View user's profile Send private message
 
Aaron
Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 12:49 pm Reply with quote
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 4645

Almost forgot:

View user's profile Send private message
 
twowheelwiz
Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 4:52 pm Reply with quote
Joined: 26 Apr 2007 Posts: 96 Location: Greenwood

I saw a couple crazy dudes in Alaska with gas cans strapped to the sides of their waverunners, on their way to south america. It was hilarious watching them try and tie up to the fuel dock around all the big fishing boats. That was last year- I wonder where they are now....
View user's profile Send private message
 
Aaron
Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 8:24 pm Reply with quote
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 4645

Ride there instead.
View user's profile Send private message
 
SeditiousCanary
Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2007 10:40 pm Reply with quote
sorry, can't make it! Joined: 26 Jan 2006 Posts: 2315 Location: Fremont Troll

Aaron wrote:
Most 2-stoke engines..... lawn mowers, leaf blowers, mopeds (sorry Dean), chain saws, etc, are just plain noisier than they need to be.


Ironically, the thing which makes two strokes more efficient also makes them louder.

http://www.hpt-sport.com/tunedpip.htm
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
 
Reply to topic
Page 1 of 1    
Point83.com Forum Index  »  Westlake Center  »  OT: a race but not an alleycat
All times are GMT - 8 Hours
The time now is Sat Aug 12, 2023 9:41 am
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
 


Forums | Calendar | TOS | Tapirs

© 2004-2015 Point83
Point83 is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Joby Lafky Corporation