Even more entertainingly, this appears to be an authentic Mozart piece.
vaticdart
Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 6:15 am
Joined: 02 Aug 2007Posts: 649Location: Inside a Bell
This proves that my taste for classical music has not been in vain.
_________________ If the river was whiskey I'd turn myself into a duck, I'd dive to the bottom and never come up.
ripper
Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 6:37 am
evilmikeJoined: 19 Apr 2006Posts: 640Location: Capitalist Hill
Well I'll be damned.
Being distrustful of wikipedia, I did some poking around in more authoritative sources. He wrote two songs about ass licking. Weird.
_________________ Some of us like things. Some of us are just joyless, bitter assholes.
Foo
Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 6:58 am
Joined: 27 Jul 2007Posts: 583
When I first read the article when I got home, I LOL'd and thought it was a prank that got onto the front page.
This morning, I looked more closely and realized that not only was it serious, it had copious and solid citations to back it up.
This article has opened up a door onto the classical world I'm a little ambivalent about. I'm now a touch worried that next they'll uncover Bach's felching canon in C sharp minor BWV 1238 or something.
surlykat
Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 7:16 am
Joined: 05 Jul 2007Posts: 658Location: in the CD
Foo wrote:
This article has opened up a door onto the classical world I'm a little ambivalent about. I'm now a touch worried that next they'll uncover Bach's felching canon in C sharp minor BWV 1238 or something.
LOL. But Mozart was notorious for this kind of crap - didn't you see Amadeus? If Bach was a felcher, something tells me history has forgotten it (thankfully).
gsbarnes
Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 8:57 am
Joined: 15 Aug 2006Posts: 2666Location: No Fun Town, USA
I read the Letters of Mozart when I was an undergraduate, and just let me say this is not a surprise. Lots of comments about farts and the like. Mozart would love today's kid's movies.
_________________ I have always thought in the back of my mind: Cheese and Onions
langston
Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 9:29 am
Joined: 25 Jul 2005Posts: 5547Location: Columbia City
oh lolz!
I'm not terribly suprised (I saw Amadeus) but this is great. My coworker snorted coffee out his nose reading it, FTW.
The Bach-Werke-Verzeichnis only goes up to 1120. Accordingly, if there ever /were/ a new Bach composition discovered, it'd be BWV 1121 (convenient since the BWV is grouped thematically, and we can all agree a drinking song about... whatever you guys were calling it... would likely be a one off oddity, and that's the last category). More likely, it'd find it's way into the Verzeichnis Anhang (catalogue appendix) after years of academic debate on whether the piece was a genuine Mozart, or merely a "composition in the school of Mozart".
For what it's worth, the accepted BWV hasn't changed since the early nineties. Like 1991 if I remember right. So don't hold your breath.
Anyways, as a former professional quartet member (you can make good money playing violin and harpsichord at weddings!), I have to assert that there is no such thing as "obscure classical music", only brides uncultured enough to request Pachelbell's Canon in D for their recessional.
surlykat
Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 6:21 pm
Joined: 05 Jul 2007Posts: 658Location: in the CD
Matthew wrote:
I have to assert that there is no such thing as "obscure classical music", only brides uncultured enough to request Pachelbell's Canon in D for their recessional.
Anyways, as a former professional quartet member (you can make good money playing violin and harpsichord at weddings!), I have to assert that there is no such thing as "obscure classical music", only brides uncultured enough to request Pachelbell's Canon in D for their recessional.
Huh? Yes, Pachelbel sucks (esp. when you're a cellist), but how does that translate into there being no obscure classical music? There's TONS of obscure shit.
SeditiousCanary
Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 6:40 pm
sorry, can't make it!Joined: 26 Jan 2006Posts: 2315Location: Fremont Troll
bobhall wrote:
There's TONS of obscure shit.
But you're only a music major. How does that qualify you to talk about music? I mean I think your theories on quantum mechanics and faster than light travel are the best I've ever heard, but I really think you should stick to your areas of expertise.
Also:
Your ideas fascinate me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
All times are GMT - 8 Hours
The time now is Sat Aug 12, 2023 10:43 am
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Joined: 27 Jul 2007
Posts: 583
Joined: 02 Aug 2007
Posts: 649
Location: Inside a Bell
evilmike
Joined: 19 Apr 2006
Posts: 640
Location: Capitalist Hill
Joined: 05 Jul 2007
Posts: 658
Location: in the CD
Joined: 15 Aug 2006
Posts: 2666
Location: No Fun Town, USA
Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 5547
Location: Columbia City
rookie
Joined: 20 Aug 2007
Posts: 1173
Location: Sur le nord-ouest des États-Unis, pret de la frontier Québécois
Joined: 28 Jul 2006
Posts: 460
sorry, can't make it!
Joined: 26 Jan 2006
Posts: 2315
Location: Fremont Troll
