Page 1 of 1
compact road vs. double vs. triple?

Posted:
Wed May 14, 2008 8:48 am
by Eric_s
HAY.
I'm finally buying parts for the cross check I got for my birthday. I've been looking at the plethora of possible parts and yano, I'm a little stuck. I need to get a crankset + BB, and I wonder if anyone has any suggestions for one which is not too heavy and which is reasonably durable. I have found a sugino compact crankset which seems pretty cool, except for the JIS square taper. I am tempted to just get a shimano ultegra or 105, but the splined BB and integrated crank seems a little sketchy. Campy?
What's your favorite?
Re: compact road vs. double vs. triple?

Posted:
Wed May 14, 2008 9:12 am
by martin
Re: compact road vs. double vs. triple?

Posted:
Wed May 14, 2008 9:24 am
by Eric_s

Posted:
Wed May 14, 2008 11:09 am
by Razi

Posted:
Wed May 14, 2008 11:33 am
by Eric_s

Posted:
Wed May 14, 2008 11:38 am
by langston

Posted:
Wed May 14, 2008 11:46 am
by the dreaded ben

Posted:
Wed May 14, 2008 11:51 am
by Razi

Posted:
Wed May 14, 2008 12:20 pm
by martin

Posted:
Wed May 14, 2008 1:15 pm
by zuvembi
I'm cheap and lazy. After I toasted the cranks that came stock on my CrossCheck I went and bought a triple 110/74 - <a href="http://aebike.com/page.cfm?PageID=30&action=details&sku=CR1033">Sugino XD300</a> crankset and ran it as a compact double with a 110 mm BB. It worked just fine.
The only thing not to like - that bolt hidden behind the crank arm shit.

Posted:
Wed May 14, 2008 1:38 pm
by SeditiousCanary

Posted:
Wed May 14, 2008 2:38 pm
by vaticdart

Posted:
Wed May 14, 2008 5:00 pm
by Alex

Posted:
Wed May 14, 2008 5:09 pm
by Matthew

Posted:
Wed May 14, 2008 6:48 pm
by Eric_s
I do fine in seattle on my 42x16 (as long as I'm not blackout drunk), but then, I wouldn't want to hammer that sucker up 50 miles of rolling hills. I can get away with a compact double (and the one I was looking at would have given me a range from 33-115 gear inches) but the change from the low ring to the high ring was something like 4 cogs to get the next step (as in I would have to shift down 3 or 4 cogs to get something less than 10 gear inches) and i just wonder how useful that is; on my current 105 triple (road bike), I manage to use all the front rings regularly enough.

Posted:
Wed May 14, 2008 9:25 pm
by lantius
yeah, what matthew can ride and what eric can ride are not the same.
go for the triple. i like the 26-36-46 front and 11-34 rear on my lht - 20" to 113" with my 700x35 tires. i've considered changing it up for a low double (40-22), since i very rarely need to have over 100" but for towing and utility purposes i could occasionally benefit from a lower gear.

Posted:
Thu May 15, 2008 8:04 am
by Eric_s

Posted:
Thu May 15, 2008 8:44 am
by zuvembi

Posted:
Thu May 15, 2008 8:51 am
by martin

Posted:
Thu May 15, 2008 9:07 am
by joeball

Posted:
Thu May 15, 2008 9:28 am
by key lime

Posted:
Thu May 15, 2008 9:32 am
by Eric_s

Posted:
Thu May 15, 2008 9:42 am
by Alex

Posted:
Thu May 15, 2008 11:57 am
by martin

Posted:
Thu May 15, 2008 12:08 pm
by Matthew

Posted:
Thu May 15, 2008 2:26 pm
by Eric_s

Posted:
Thu May 15, 2008 2:58 pm
by the dreaded ben
great, he's getting a triple, and now for some horse cock.